Loading

Did the Book of Mormon speak of crucifixion before its time?

And behold he cometh, according to the words of the angel, in six hundred years from the time my father left Jerusalem.
And the world, because of their iniquity, shall judge him to be a thing of naught; wherefore they scourge him, and he suffereth it; and they smite him, and he suffereth it. Yea, they spit upon him, and he suffereth it, because of his loving kindness and his long-suffering towards the children of men.
And the God of our fathers, who were led out of Egypt, out of bondage, and also were preserved in the wilderness by him, yea, the God of Abraham, and of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, yieldeth himself, according to the words of the angel, as a man, into the hands of wicked men, to be lifted up, according to the words of Zenock, and to be crucified, according to the words of Neum, and to be buried in a sepulchre, according to the words of Zenos,
And as for those who are at Jerusalem, saith the prophet, they shall be scourged by all people, because they crucify the God of Israel, and turn their hearts aside, rejecting signs and wonders, and the power and glory of the God of Israel.  1 Nephi 19:8-10, 13

The Book of Mormon, with amazing accuracy, claims to prophesy the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus Christ 600 years before it happened.  Isaiah 53, written around 700 BC and the closest biblical prophecy in terms of description that pictures the crucifixion of Christ, only alludes to a death that could be crucifxion but does not call it crucifixion.  Why?

Isaiah would not know the word "crucify" because crucifixions were not known around 600 BC.  Some sources say they just got started around that time, but Alexander the Great (356-323 BC) popularized the method of torture.  The Romans picked up the practice and used it more commonly.

It's impossible for Nephi to call something a crucifixion before they were around.  Isaiah describes a crucifixion in vague/clear terms, but does not call it by name.